The Phaserl


Is the LBMA Silver Price more transparent than the Fix? No!

by Lawrence Williams,

So now we have had three days of the new LBMA Silver Price – the new name for the London Silver Fixing given that the term ‘Fix’ is somewhat discredited in modern-day parlance. The banks involved in the old system, which had fallen to two, wanted to withdraw from it, in part because they felt the process, even if it was a totally honest system, which it probably was, could lay them open to having to defend expensive, and probably spurious, lawsuits and the London Bullion Market Association took upon itself to go out and set up some kind of new silver benchmarking process at very short notice.

And is this new process any more transparent than the old one – one of the main charges laid against the old Silver fixing process. The answer so far is probably not!

Although one assumes it could become more open as the markets get to understand how it operates its new rather obscure process dealing in lakhs of silver rather than ounces, and in converting it back to a per ounce price. (A lakh is a South Asian term for 100,000 units – in this case ounces.) Why on earth such a measure was chosen defeats us – it just seems to be another way to obfuscate what should be a relatively straightforward process.

Read More @

Help us spread the ANTIDOTE to corporate propaganda.

Please follow SGT Report on Twitter & help share the message.

1 comment to Is the LBMA Silver Price more transparent than the Fix? No!

  • Sprottie

    Hey, maybe China’s huge inventory drop of Au was cuz of foreknowledge of this new scheme to keep silver prices under ‘control”. Eh, What?

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>