The Phaserl


Fox News “Legal” Analyst Says It’s Appropriate For Gov’t to ‘Make an Example’ out of Snowden, Targets Glenn Greenwald For His “Anti-Gov’t” Position

from Fox News, via MichaelSavage4Prez:

Shortly after Glenn Greenwald made his appearance on Fox & Friends to blast the Obama administration’s handling of NSA leaker Edward Snowden, legal analyst Peter Johnson, Jr., offered his critique of the Guardian reporter, emphasizing his “advocacy journalism” as reason to keep the reporter’s stories at arm’s length. “Greenwald has it a little bit mixed up,” Johnson told hosts Eric Bolling and Gretchen Carlson. “I do think the government is trying to make an example of Mr. Snowden because I believe that he broke the law. And so it’s appropriate to make an example out of him.”

Help us spread the ANTIDOTE to corporate propaganda.

Please follow SGT Report on Twitter & help share the message.

8 comments to Fox News “Legal” Analyst Says It’s Appropriate For Gov’t to ‘Make an Example’ out of Snowden, Targets Glenn Greenwald For His “Anti-Gov’t” Position

  • Bas

    Hitler also never did anything illegal in Germany. Obama is a tyrant.

  • blounttruth

    @ Bas
    You are correct sir, and George Bush was the catalyst of what was to inevitably be the gateway to tyranny. All of the law makers that voted for the Patriot Act, Military Commissions Act, NDAA, to name a few are also tyrants on both sides of the isle. Notice the Faux news legal analyst never once mentioned the fact that the court had already ruled that the NSA’s actions were unconstitutional and in a direct violation of law, only that Snowden had violated the law, very telling. He stated he would wave the constitution when necessary, yet even though he knows that the constitution had been violated he was not on Fox to wave the Constitution, but to shoot the messenger, the whistle blower; who to date, has yet to harm a single person, very telling indeed.

  • Eric

    Geez where did they get this clown? “Not exactly accurate”. Yeah that’s everything you just said. Debating this idiot would be like talking to a brick wall. There is a difference between the words “legal” and “lawful.”. This doorknob is talking about neither. He’s trying to cover up and put you back to sleep. Nighty nite America.

  • Paul Prichard (Paper Bear)

    ‘If the constitution comes first’ he says when in fact the constitution most definitely comes first, second, last and always.

  • Rodster

    What else can you expect from the govt media complex? Faux News is no different than the rest of the mainstream news outlets. The criminals are the US govt for spying on it’s own people.

  • zorbo

    Peter Johnson Jr. yet another spin doctor attempting to misdirect our attention away from the fact that our government is SPYING and DATA MINING us. When the Patriot Act was being “debated” a few nay sayers were letting us know this would be the result. The people who were pushing it were saying it is only communication with “terrorists”. Now we know who the government believes are “terrorists”. So that being said, what will this new immigration bill balloon into, especially with e-verify.

  • YankeeDoodle

    A tree is known by the fruit it bears.

  • AgShaman

    Hahahaha….He “sicked” the wikileaks bogeyman upon the audience.

    What a hackjob nutter…hahaha

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>