by Fred Weinberg, WesternJournalism.com:
Editor’s note: The views expressed by the author below do not necessarily reflect those of the Western Center For Journalism.
If Barack Obama could pick a single thing to both make conservatives mad as well as his liberal base, it would seem to be his drone campaign against terrorists who happen to also be American citizens.
But this also may be one of the few times in my life that I feel a need to, at least partially, come to the defense of the President.
Is there any American out there who can seriously argue that Anwar al-Awlaki didn’t need to be taken out?
I don’t know any conservative or libertarian who is against killing a citizen/terrorist on the battlefield.
The problem is the liberal and media hypocracy…. pouring water on a terrorist’s face is cruel and is an outrage but killing a terrorist is OK.
Fuck Obama. Everything he say’s is a twisted lie. His actions, and those around him, speak volumes.
The u.s. could have revoked his citizenship. Then he would have been a combatant.
http://www.newcitizen.us/losing.html
(Members of the the 3 branches are guilty of # 2.)
The Constitution defines the requirements for convicting someone of treason (see #1).
Please note that the U.S. created him and OTHERS like him.
They had to because there was no longer a “COLD WAR.”
They needed a new enemy, a new war.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-rYMjgs2nE&feature=player_embedded
Sounds like Western Journalism has been hypnotized under Obama’s spell. Anwar al-Awlaki, for anyone who has bothered to listen to him and to know what he believed – NOT WHAT THE MEDIA TOLD YOU HE WAS – would find that he was actually quite a beautiful human being. He was a threat because of that beauty and power. He could not be bought by the globalists aka terrorists. But then apparently, they will be droning Americans on American soil soon so take a good, long, everlasting look at Anwar al-Awlaki. He was their model.