The Phaserl


Sandy Hook: Cop in CT on the Contradictions, Inconsistencies & Gun Grab

Our friend Mark S. Mann is back. He’s a cop, he’s in Connecticut and he and I have a LOT of QUESTIONS about the contradictions and inconsistencies of the official story of the Sandy Hook Elementary school massacre – and resulting gun grab.

  Part 1:

  Part 2:
Help us spread the ANTIDOTE to corporate propaganda.

Please follow SGT Report on Twitter & help share the message.

46 comments to Sandy Hook: Cop in CT on the Contradictions, Inconsistencies & Gun Grab

  • Robert Gest IV

    Sean, could you post the points made by the officer? They make wonderful talking points and could you also include your observations in bullet (no pun intended) point form?

  • Eric

    Thanks guys, really appreciate these interviews.

  • Per my observation at all our local gun stores,the gov may have a bit of a problem if they decide to confiscate.All they have accomplished is to have people buying guns that never owned them before all of this.I kinda want to say thank you unc sam for arming more of us.

    • uncviper23

      I don’t want to presume you are talking to me unless you are, but if you are I want to be clear, I DO NOT WANT TO DO ANY OF THIS but having said that neither will I be a coward. Men and women born in such as time as this is by no accident or mistake. WE are the generation to defend our rights and liberties. We have slept many of us way to long. It’s now or forever looking back in shame and regret. Whatever happens I pray God give me the strength and if you can receive any glory from my life I give it to you Lord.

      I believe few of us know who we really are but we’re about to find out in trials of fire as God’s word says. I pray we all have the strength to look back on day and not be ashamed of how we handle our history.

      If you don’t have passion about this find it because without it you’ll burnout quickly.

  • WHAT “victims” ? how ’bout CRISIS ACTORS ?…I have lots of info I’ve researched out regarding what supposedly happened at SANDY HOOK and have done a WHOIS on each of the websites in this post which brings up even more interesting connections…CRISISACTORS.ORG came into existence just about 3 weeks AFTER the AURORA shootings

    Active Shooter Crisis Actors via Visionbox

    DENVER, CO, October 31, 2012 — A new group of actors is now available nationwide for active shooter drills and mall shooting full-scale exercises, announced Visionbox, Denver’s leading professional actors studio.

    Visionbox Crisis Actors are trained in criminal and victim behavior, and bring intense realism to simulated mass casualty incidents in public places.

    See latest video productions here

    The actors’ stage acting experience, ranging from Shakespeare to contemporary American theater, enables them to “stay in character” throughout an exercise, and improvise scenes of extreme stress while strictly following official exercise scenarios.

    The actors regularly rehearse scenarios involving the Incident Command System and crisis communications, and appear in interactive training films produced in both 2D and stereoscopic 3D.

    Producers Jennifer McCray Rincon and John Simmons formed the group to demonstrate emerging security technologies, help first responders visualize life-saving procedures, and assist trainers in delivering superior hands-on crisis response training.

    For example, with a large shopping center, the producers review all security camera views and design dramatic scenes specifically for existing camera angles, robotic camera sweeps, and manually-controlled camera moves.

    The producers then work with the trainers to create a “prompt book” for the actors so that key scenario developments can be triggered throughout the mall shooting simulation, and caught on tape.

    The actors can play the part of the shooters, mall employees, shoppers in the mall, shoppers who continue to arrive at the mall, media reporters and others rushing to the mall, and persons in motor vehicles around the mall.

    Visionbox Crisis Actors can also play the role of citizens calling 911 or mall management, or posting comments on social media websites.

    During the exercise, the producers use two-way radio to co-direct the Crisis Actors team from the mall dispatch center and at actors’ locations.

    Within this framework, the exercise can test the mall’s monitoring and communications systems, the mall’s safety plan including lockdown and evacuation procedures, the ability of first responders and the mall to coordinate an effective response, and their joint ability to respond to the media and information posted on the Internet.

    Security camera footage is edited for after-action reports and future training.
    For more information visit and

  • Excellent interview, covers all of the open/unanswered questions that MUST be answered and accounted for. It’s good to hear the from the viewpoint of a law enforcement professional and that individuals of that caliber are asking the right questions.Keep it up Sean, this issue/story can not be allowed to die.At some point the full truth will be known.

    Yesterday you posted an article about this mass killing in which there could be an occult connection.Here is my re-posting of my response because it’s a fact that Ritual Blood Sacrifice is real and occurring and it needs to be recognized and understood.
    “In the higher levels of Wiccan/Satanic ritualistic sacrifice,the individual(s)performing the blood sacrifice believe they are receiving the “Life Energy” from the victim when they are dispatched/killed.What’s more important/desired/coveted with regards towards this blood sacrifice, the blood sacrifice of a “Young Child” is the most desired, the “Creme De La Creme” of Blood Sacrifice.They believe the greatest/purest amount of this Life Energy comes from killing a young child.These are the most depraved animals that are walking the Planet.And guess who they are, They may be/are your Laywers,Doctors, Educators,Academics,Nurses,Engineers,Clerks,Politicians of all stripes,Generals,Admirals,Police,Military, etc and they number in the Tens Of Thousands throughout the US and every Country”. There are thousands of covens located throughout this country and this killing/sacrificing is taking place.Just think of all of the thousands of missing and murdered children taking place each year.Many are the victims of these depraved individuals no doubt.

  • Johnny

    ANOTHER inconsistency:

    An article released on the 28th of December recounted the original claim by police that Lanza wore body armor. Why did it take 13 days for police to release this information? Seems to me, they should have set the record straight immediately.

  • Brits Warn U.S. Don’t Give Up Your Guns
    “Free men own guns… Slaves don’t.”

    Media Ignores Shooting Stopped by Law-Abiding Gun Owner

  • johns

    I sure would like to know who “anonymously” claimed his body.

  • GoodOleBoy

    So many questions, so little answers. These events show these people for who they really are. It is also sad that our men and women in uniform are forced to hide their thoughts and opinions our of fear of punishment and ridicule.

    What is important that was pointed out that people are waking up and the media is doing all it can to hide that fact. On all the alternative media sites and talk radio programs always use the media as a judge of popular opinion. The truth is that their viewers are leaving in droves and they doesnt include people like me that watch every now and again to see what BS they are putting out. They also use polls, like a recent one saying 58% of the people are for gun control. I dont know about you guys but I dont recall any poll agency asking myself or anyone I know their position on gun control.

    A gun grab will not be successful but could be ugly. I urge everyone to call the Congressmen and Senators now and tell them to leave our guns alone. Its not hard or time consuming, just call and tell the aid you are against any gun control legislation. Their numbers can be found here:

    Happy New Year, its gonna be a wild one.

    • Freedumbs'ear

      I read that petition.That would allow all persons guns to be confiscated if you know what those words mean. That really isn’t a problem for people cause it only applies to corporations not people.

  • Johnny


    The car that was said to be driven by Adam Lanza is registered to someone else, a person with a rather shady past and (perhaps) at least one VERY shady connection as well, as you will read in the link below.

    And what about the bullet holes found in the car of teacher Lauren Rousseau, which was in the school parking lot? One appears to be an EXIT hole. This is the first I heard of any shooting taking place in the parking lot. Again, look at the pictures in the link below and judge for yourself.

    Lastly, the blog identifies the man caught in the woods dressed partially in camo as the (supposed) father of a student, but I’ve been unable to find out any more about this person when I search his name.

  • Johnny


  • Nick4Liberty

    Johnny posted a great link here with this article. This is the first anyone has heard of this and if its true it would change everything! If there is any truth to the Honda being registered to this Rodia character and not Lanza’s mother like the media reported maybe Mark S. Mann could find out? The plate number is clearly visible in the picture.

  • Johnny

    To Mark S. Mann:

    A couple of days after the Sandy Hook incident, I posted scanner recordings on SGT that I found on YouTube in which you can distinctly hear police discussing the marker plate number of a van that was attempting to leave the scene as police arrived. The van came back to a rental vehicle from Wayne, NJ. I have heard no explanation of who was in the van, but I get the impression that these may be the people the police had “proned out”. If you are familiar with this, perhaps you could comment on why a rental vehicle from NJ was on school property that day.

  • Johnny


    Beside the link that I initially provided earlier, I did some searching on YouTube and came up with one other clip backing this up. It delves even further into this issue than the blog article and opens up the possibility that Rodia was offered a “get out of jail free card” in exchange for participating in this false flag. Of course, it’s speculation and we need to first confirm that the owner of the car is in fact Rodia and (was) not someone from the Lanza family. But the clip is very telling. To fully comprehend it, you will have to pause the video periodically.

  • Truthseeker

    Everyone please watch the video below and pass it on to everyone you know; especially those who support gun grabbers. THIS IS THE END GAME OF GUN CONTROL LAWS. Politicians like Feinstein know this information, and should be unmasked and seen for the true monsters they are. What they are trying to do to Americans by disarmament should not only be treated as treason, but attempted murder and genocide. After seeing this short documentary you will likely agree.

  • Doug

    The Interview was interesting, and I have no doubt something is up. However, one point that no one is making regarding the gun grab is that it can’t legally happen. The previous ban was unconstitutional, and held because it was never challenged in court. While the legislature can do many things, and make many laws, it cannot make a law that subverts or removes any of the 10 ammendments that make up our bill of rights. The key here folks is “ammendment”. The constitution will have to be ammended, which will require ratification by the states to become law, which won’t happen… (too many pro gun states exist to worry about that for now)

    Unless the law is presented, and voted on by congress as an ammendment to the constitution, any gun ban congress passes can be stopped in its tracks by any citizen by simply filing suit for an injunction in federal court, a cost of about 30.00 to file. You don’t even need an attorney. Of course there is always a possibility the judge the case is assigned to could be an activist liberal and would not grant the injunction. In that case you would need to get an attorney and file an appeal. At that point a circuit court of appeals would hear the case and make a ruling, granting the injunction, or sending it back to the lower courts. If the ruling is the same, appeal it again with the request for it to be heard by the supreme court, which is where the issue needs to wind up any way to be resolved once and for all. It cannot win because a new ammendment is the “ONLY” way possible to override an existing ammendment.

    • Truthseeker

      With all due respect; If the founding fathers believed that laws written on paper were good enough to stop tyrants from stealing and murdering, they would not have included the second amendment to the constitution. Nor would they have bothered to physically keep military weapons to protect themselves.

      Unfortunately, the history of mankind is written in the blood of those who are not sufficiently armed to stop men who are.

      • Doug

        I agree completely, The second ammendment is the backbone of the constitution. I also will be on the front lines defending it by what ever means neccessary when ever the time comes. I was only trying to point out that we have the power to stop them without having to resort to civil war or violence, provided the majority of our representatives, both legislative and judicial, follow the constitution. If not, and they try to take our guns, they will start a war with “We the People” and they will loose.

  • Doug

    One other point I would like to make. The same goes for Executive Orders. Any citizen can simply file suit for an injunction against any Executive order, and it’s constitutionality will have to be reviewed by the courts. Our President has no more or no fewer rights than we citizens do. He only has power over us if we don’t exersize our rights.

  • NaySayer

    Send Feinstein an email at

    There is a form you can fill out there to send a message. I have been active in libertarian politics and therefore am already on their bad list so I sent her the following email:

    Only governments who intend to enslave and slaughter their citizens take guns from honest law abiding people. Is it your intention to perpetrate a genocide on the american people?

    WWI Armenia, Mao’s China, Stalinist Russia, Nazi Germany, Cambodia, Rwanda, Uganda etc. etc. 170 million people dead in the 20th century alone after having been disarmed by their governments. This is what happens when people allow their constitutionally guaranteed rights to be taken from them. You do not have the authority to overturn the constitution. 2nd amendment rights are guaranteed as a citizen.

    Only slave populations are disarmed. Are you trying to start a civil war in america? Because that is what you are going to do. First they take some guns, then they register the others, then they up the fees for permits or find ways to deny them and then only elite & their thugs have guns. Then the population is slaughtered. This has ALWAYS happened. I believe that the Sandy Hook shooting was a government false flag to shock people into giving up the guns. It won’t work. It has been done too many times since 9/11.

    YOu have a gun permit, are you more deserving of self protectin than the rest of us??? California may go for this but the rest of the nation won’t. Unarmed populations are slaughtered by their governments. That is the clear warning of history.

  • Mark S. Mann

    Hello Friends, Mark S. Mann here:
    The problem I have with events of this type (obvious false flag operations) is that people get caught up in the details about who, what, where,and when, instead of the WHY.Its not about what happened, it IS about what “They” are going to use the event for, to push an agenda, or to influence or change public opinion. In this case that is the destruction of the people’s ability to own , possess or access various types of weapons, which would weaken the last check and balance American citizens have against a tyrannical government.

    The general public can not handle conspiracy theory of this magnitude. I don’t even go there or address any of these issues in my interviews or writings because you loose too many people, and you get dismissed as a tin foil hat guy.

    The purpose of me sticking my neck out is to get people thinking and is to #1.) spread truth to those who are interested in finding it, and# 2.) to attempt to wake people up to what is really happening in our Nation, before it is to late. I think I can do that with analysis of basic facts, without having to divulge too far into speculative conspiracy, regardless of how probable or factual it may be.

    The details, discrepancies, and behind the scenes bullshit about the Newtown School Shooting will soon be irrelevant, once the Obama Administration puts forth its agenda for the attempted gun grab. No one will care about the details of Sandy Hook then, and not only will they not care, they will not remember. The public will be onto the next new event or story.

    • NaySayer

      And that is the very definition of “terrorism”. The use of violence & the terror it causes to bring about political change.

      The government of america, if they perpetrated this false flag to get a gun grab that more people would support are terrorists.

  • Mark S. Mann

    Hello Friends,

    Mark S
    . Mann here:

    The purpose of this post is to address several comments that have appeared in the comments section of the recent videos that I did on Sandy Hook Shootings posted on SGT’s YouTube Channel. Although I do not expect those who made these comments on YouTube to see my comments on SGT Report, this is the only venue I have to respond. I am doing so for the public record, and for the benefit of those who are interested in the truth. Take it or leave it.

    1.) Sean from SGT has vetted that I am a police lieutenant, and that I currently work for an agency as a lieutenant on a part time basis. He also vetted the fact that I am also a senior executive in the firearms industry, and that I also work for (2) law enforcement training companies. Yes, I get around. This provides a very unique perspective of events through a set of eyes that has technical skills and expertise.

    2.) No one has to believe anything about me, or anything that I say. I am not here to prove anything to anyone. I don’t get paid for anything that I do for SGT. The exact details of who I am and who I work for are none of anyone’s fucking business. If I have to explain to anyone why I choose to be anonymous when diving into the subject matter I cover, you need to get a reality check. If you have a problem with that, my question is how are you sticking your neck out other than by making a stupid comment with an anonymous YouTube user name? If you don’t like what I have to say, don’t read or listen, it’s that simple. The World will keep spinning either way.

    3.) There are obviously some people who have a strong distrust and hatred towards ANY member of law enforcement. I can totally understand that, as I was not always a police officer. However, anyone that lumps 100% of the people, in any group, into 1 category is a fucking idiot, in my opinion. I am trying to help people recognize the truth. If people dismiss what I say, just because I have a badge, those people lack the critical thinking skills that would allow them to see the truth if it were right in front of their face. Good luck with your ignorance and hatred. It must suck to be you.

    4.) Last but NOT least. I don’t give a shit about any single fact, detail or piece of misinformation covered by me or anyone else that has made commentary about this tragedy. Nothing about Sandy Hook being a questionable incident hinges on one detail or issue. I have now dug deep enough into this to be satisfied about my own conclusions about what this really was, and I think many of you are with me on this. I think there is enough information in the public domain to illustrate that the “official” story is full of holes. Rather than get stuck on any issue or details about this incident, people need to realize WHY this was done. This was an attack on the Second Amendment. If people don’t see that, hopefully for their sake, Ignorance will be bliss.

    Best Wishes & Happy New Year.

  • Nick4Liberty

    Mark, first and foremost I’d like to say and I think I speak for most of us that I greatly appreciate you coming on here to give your perspective on this incident. We know what is at stake for you to do this and why you have to remain anonymous. Anyone who criticizes you for that is beyond ignorant.

    Secondly, I fully understand why you choose to focus on the why, as this is the most important part of these incidents. Especially when the agenda is to disarm us and take away our liberties and freedoms. For me anyway, the reason I look for proof of foul play and a conspiracy is so that when I take my view of this to people who are totally asleep and believe the mainstream propaganda they don’t just dismiss me as paranoid with some insane theory. I actually have proof of foul play to back this up, so choosing to believe the “official story” won’t be as easy to do. Granted with all the proof in the world some of the brainwashed sheeple still won’t believe, but still this is why I look for things to back up what I’m telling them.

    As far as the comment on youtube, this person is obviously beyond ignorant and trying to stir the pot. Its very concievable they are even cointelpro as it is well known it exists today as much or more as the 1960’s. Regardless, we know who you are and who you aren’t Mark and we appreciate you coming on SGT for this interview and the others you have done. Happy New Year!

  • Troy

    I dare any person try to take my .45 from me

  • Tina

    Did we see any bloody footprints coming out of the building? NO! Did ANYONE photograph or video any of the 26 bodies being loaded into (how many ambulances would it take)? NO! Did any of us see video from the (new) security system showing Lanza entering the building? NO! Did any of you see the HSEEP Training Course drill from 2 years ago located at Sandy Hook School? I did. You can see it here -
    Did any of you see the video of (so called father) Robbie Parker laughing and joking before taking a deep breath and getting himself into the character of a bereaved father? I did. You can see it here –
    That was the begining of my search for the truth. Indeed, Sandy Hook (as well as all the other shootings) was a false flag operation from begining to end. BUT (here comes the hard to believe part) NO ONE was killed! There was no blood because NO ONE was killed! All the people interviewed were ACTORS playing their roles. That’s why all the inconsistancies. They are getting so bold that they don’t even prepare properly anymore.
    All these shootings are to convince the public that we need to get rid of all our guns. What better way than to (use) children to do it. There was no Lanza in the building shooting all the children. There was no mother shot in the face. Did we see any evidence of either? NO! Hard to believe but these actors are not used soley for the purpose of Sandy Hook, but the shooting in CO. and all the other false flag shootings.
    You can see these actors at if his site hasn’t been shut down again. I don’t agree with everything he says but there is more than enough evidence to convince even the worst skeptic. It will then all start to come together for you like it did for me. It’s all very sad for our beloved Country. The ‘elites’ and the government have taken over and now want to take us captive! God help us!

    • Bob A

      SGT, Mark and others, Tina does bring up some good points. If there were 27 people killed, and most shot 6-11 times, it would be a mess inside that school. Did anyone see all those bodies taken out? Wouldn’t there be more pictures taken of all the ambulances taking away that many bodies? And for parents to say they are okay with never seeing their child, because they want to remember the good sweet angel they were…I mean, really? I have 2 small children…and they would have to kill me to not see them again. This whole event stinks to high heaven. Maybe Obama wasn’t wiping those fake tears from his eyes because of the sadness of the event, but wiping tears from laughing so hard, because he knows he once again duped a gullible public.

  • Nick4Liberty

    I agree there were actors placed into this thing but are you really insinuating that Tony Hawk, Matthew Broderick and the guy from Mad TV were all actors in this? Come on. Thats insane! Its stuff like that that discredits any truther and makes us all look like lunatics!

    • Nick4Liberty

      I understand the quest for truth in this because I’d like to know too but we will never know, it goes too deep and while we are all worrying about the details (myself included) the agenda is being carried out. Illinois just moved to ban ALL FIREARMS!!

    • SGT

      There is a guy on YT (Dallas something I think) who makes vids suggesting that people in stories are being played by famous actors – in that particular case, with his specific vids – he is nuts. Disinfo! And that wellaware1 is absolute 100% Disinfo too.

      • Nick4Liberty

        The videos I have seen from that Dallas guy seem very plausable and seem t have truth to them. He doesn’t say that the actors are famous but shows a lot of connections between people from this incident (The Phelps couple) and victims in the Giffords shooting. You can see the connections he makes and the picture of the Phelps and they are the same peope. Thats just from what I can see.

  • LetTruthReign

    Powerful people fix the rules in their favor and always will. This isn’t a conspiracy.

  • Know what happen when self defense of your life and property is illegal.
    Let Feinsein know she is in dishonor of her congressional oath to defend and protect the US COnstitution.

  • Mark S. Mann

    Hello Friends,
    In response to a few of the comments here, I want to mention that Sean & I specifically stayed away from the topic of the bodies. We thought about going there, but decided it would be in poor taste to discuss the probable wound ballistics and effects of multiple gun shots from 5.56mm on 5-6 year old children. After discussing it privately between ourselves, we decided not to pursue that topic for obvious reasons. I think this was a good decision, and now other people are discussing this. What I will say is the following:

    1.) The amount of rounds expended on each victim seems to be going up every time I hear a story related to that subject.

    2.) If you shoot any living thing that is the size of the target we are talking about, multiple times, at close range, with a 5.56mm weapon system, it will be pretty messy, period.

    3.) Rather than focus on speculative details about any of this material, why not focus on the actual statements given by the CT chief medical examiner Dr. Carver? If you read his statements and answers to questions asked by the media, that should tell anyone with half a brain this whole thing stinks. I have spoken with many people about this issue and no one I know has ever had, or heard of having a victim’s remains identified or confirmed from a photo. Who has the authority to pull some shit like that? What we need is a victim’s family to come forward and confirm this. If this is 100% true, this become an unprecedented action, and is highly suspicious by itself.

    AGAIN….Let’s not get lost in details that may surface years from now, or never at all. The problem is that the truth eventually does come out, but far too long after the damage is done. What good does arguing over what brought down the World Trade Center do, 11 years after the fact, now that we have The Patriot Act, the NDAA, TSA, DHS and the Afghan & Iraq Wars? If someone proved explosives were used tomorrow, what would it change about all these things? You can’t turn back the clock. Let’s put Sandy Hook behind us, learn from it as much as we can, and focus on the fight we know is coming very soon over our Second Amendment Rights!

    Best Wishes & Stay Safe!

  • Big Tim

    I think it is a mistake to assume that the Newtown Bee reporter that interviewed and quoted someone identifying herself as the principal Dawn Hochsprung had made a mistake. In their retraction/apology of 12/17 the paper seemed to be sticking with their story of 12/14 that a woman identified herself to the Newtown Bee reporter as (the paper didn’t specify in detail) either simply “the principal” or “the principal Dawn Hochsprung”. It is possible, but not probable in my opinion, that the person just ID’ed herself as the principal and the reporter added the name later. The paper also did not say if the interview was made over the or in person, which was possible as the Newtown Bee staff member Shannon Hicks was on the actual scene very quickly and was followed by John Voket. If it was in person the reporter (I haven’t read what reporter specifically although I am guessing it was one of the two mentioned)would have a physical description of the person in question and would know if it was actually Dawn Hochsprung (if the media photos are genuine) or an impostor. I doubt if the paper will be talking about this in the future and would not be surprised if they have been threatened with obstruction or some other ridiculous thing. Who would have been impersonating (if someone was) Dawn Hochsprung?

  • Big Tim

    Interesting story from Huffington:
    Partial quote:
    Her Canadian-born father, Gilles Rousseau, told Radio-Canada that he wanted to see his daughter’s body but was informed by authorities that it would not be possible.
    In a tearful interview, he said the rounds used were so powerful that they ripped through the school’s walls and left several holes in his daughter’s car outside in the parking lot.
    “They told me, ‘You can’t see (the body),'” Gilles Rousseau told Radio-Canada, the French-language CBC. “Because most people he shot, it was two or three shots in the face, point-blank.”

  • Big Tim

    I am sure everyone has read by now about the morgue employee, Jean Henry, who has been placed on administrative leave( and maybe worse) for allegedly letting her husband into the morgue and giving him a quick peek at Lanza’s (alleged) body. Mrs Henry previously had a very well paying position in CT state government (not the med examiner), she was moved by a new administration into a much lower paying job in the medical examiners office, she has a pending lawsuit concerning the move and demotion, I would guess she is a fairly intelligent woman and would have a fairly good state government pension due her in the future.
    Now why would she want her husband to have a look at Lanza’s (alleged) body? What would she want him to see (or not see)?

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>