The Phaserl


The Con Game Of Writing Up Assets: It’s Not Just The “London Whale”

from Testosterone

Normally we see the gory details only after a firm collapses, like Enron or Lehman, when vultures tear open its guts to fight over shriveled assets that had appeared fat and healthy on paper, and some of them had been written up repeatedly to create—which our accounting system encourages us to do—paper income.

Other outfits get bailed out. JPMorgan among them. A distinction made behind closed doors. They still have hollowed-out balance sheets … and the certainty, if they’re large enough, that the Fed and the Treasury, or central banks and government agencies around the world, will prop them up at a moment’s notice. Confidence is required to keep the scheme going. Once confidence fades, the scheme collapses, and central banks have to print trillions and hand them to the industry so that confidence will reassert itself, and so that the scheme can be driven to the next level. And yet, it’s all about prosaic accounting.

Accounting rules allow the use of estimates to value many assets. And estimates can be written up. If a trader or an executive imagines that an asset has increased in value, he’ll set in motion a chain reaction that will cause the company to make the adjustments, increasing the value of the asset with one entry and increasing by the same amount an income account. It’s all good. Asset value goes up, profit goes up. Trader bonus goes up. Manager bonus goes up. CEO bonus goes up. Investors froth at the mouth. Earnings per share beat analysts’ expectations. A money machine. Everyone is happy. Even regulators, their banks being strong and profitable. Halleluiah.

Read More @

Help us spread the ANTIDOTE to corporate propaganda.

Please follow SGT Report on Twitter & help share the message.

2 comments to The Con Game Of Writing Up Assets: It’s Not Just The “London Whale”

  • Frank Zak

    Testosterone Pit’s accounting idea of how they come up with bogus
    income is not correct. It’s a complex method used to fool auditors.
    Auditors check for compliance, they only casually look for fraud.
    Typically with statistical samples on such things as accounts receivable.

    Mark to market is the problem banks have now. They have not depreciated
    their assets on their books. i.e. written off the losses there from.

  • Tony

    Bernie Madoff was a sacrificial pawn of the bankers. they will sacrifice their own to keep the heat off themselves. They are a clever & devious lot.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>